How is the salary of a bioinformatician compared to a wet-lab scienstist (both hold a PhD) in the pharmaceutical/biotech industry?
How is the salary of a bioinformatician compared to a wet-lab scienstist (both hold a PhD) in the pharmaceutical/biotech industry?
It is my understanding that there are generally fewer PhD level bioinformatics positions available in industry compared to wet-lab PhD-level positions but they are often better paid. Depending on your background you can market yourself as a "data scientist" outside of biotech/pharma, which means there can be stiff competition for good bioinformaticians at that level.
But... from what I have seen, and how I led off, there tend to be far fewer PhD level positions in industry compared to wet-lab PhD level positions. Far more hires are for people with undergrad or Masters + experience. And there are a lot of candidates in that pool...
I think it would be useful for you to aggregate and plot the terms "bioinformatics scientist" and "staff scientist" on Glassdoor.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
I think this is an overly difficult comparison to undertake. The wet-lab has very many more and very different job categories and the typical duties and responsibilities are so different that even if you found such a comparison it would not be all that meaningful.
The whole industry sector would be in much better shape if folk were encouraged and rewarded for doing both concurrently
but is it realistic to expect that? I think each require such a different skill set that having both in the same person is very rare. It is like saying I need a lumberjack who is also very good with high fashion.
Not so, many exellent bioinformatitans transitioned from in vitro > in silico. True the reverse is rare but its more about facilitating cross-overs (followed by // working). I posit most Unix folk at least have the smarts to operate a pippete, PCR machine, or even load a sequencer - if they were allowed to...