A Question On Cisgenome
0
0
Entering edit mode
13.1 years ago
Hamilton ▴ 290

Dear All,

I am running cisgenome to identify known motif mapping of chipseq TF data on Windows GUI. Using one motif matrix and mm9 mouse Genome data base, If i run cisgenome for known motif mapping with Single Matrix-COD procedure. there are no errors/warnings at all, but also no output(if it works well. it should be run for a while. but for my running. it stops very quickly(guessing something wrong although, there is no error). So. i checked out my cod file which i manually converted from my bed file. It seems in the cod file, there is a problem because, all start sites of chr are zero and strand information all is plus. (I converted my bed file into cod file using file_bed2cod function of cisgenome in command line.) And in .ini file, the path looks right, does not contain any spaces.

Please see below my bed file and cod file(i converted into using file_bed2cod in command line)

##my bed file.

chr14    59135524    59135706
chrX    1.66E+08    1.66E+08
chr10    1.16E+08    1.16E+08
chr4    1.37E+08    1.37E+08
chr11    96270051    96270214
chr9    35281744    35281907
chr6    21950204    21950350
chr17    30390087    30390246
chr8    91936049    91936211
chr6    1.01E+08    1.01E+08
chr3    8717560    8717788
chr1    72356341    72356559
chr6    99863120    99863308
chrX    1.09E+08    1.09E+08
chr4    9148012    9148160
chr11    35490303    35490483
chr17    26191518    26191660
chr10    1.23E+08    1.23E+08
chr19    10391552    10391688
chr5    33284156    33284326
###my cod file after i converted bed file into using file_bed2cod.
#seq_id    chromosome    start    end    strand
chr14    0    59135524    +
chrX    0    1.66E+08    +
chr10    0    1.16E+08    +
chr4    0    1.37E+08    +
chr11    0    96270051    +
chr9    0    35281744    +
chr6    0    21950204    +
chr17    0    30390087    +
chr8    0    91936049    +
chr6    0    1.01E+08    +
chr3    0    8717560    +
chr1    0    72356341    +
chr6    0    99863120    +
chrX    0    1.09E+08    +
chr4    0    9148012    +
chr11    0    35490303    +
chr17    0    26191518    +
chr10    0    1.23E+08    +
chr19    0    10391552    +
chr5    0    33284156    +

any thoughts? I missed something here?

Your inputs will be very helpful,

chip-seq • 2.5k views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1918 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6