Enzyme cleavage rules and PeptideCutter at ExPasy
1
0
Entering edit mode
9.5 years ago
Pfs ▴ 580

I have a question regarding the cleavage rules interpretation in PeptideCutter. I contacted the helpdesk but got no reply.

How are the cleavage patterns interpreted at the end of the sequences? Towards the 3' end of a protein sequence, when the segment to consider is shorter than the actual pattern, are positions P1' and P2' (after the cut) ignored?

For example, consider the case of THROMBIN. When seq = AAPR, 1 cleavage site is reported at position 4. This makes me believe that P1' and P2' are ignored because the sequence is shorter than the pattern.

However, when seq = AAGR, no cuts are reported, which makes me believe P1' (and P2') are NOT ignored.

protein sequence • 2.3k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
9.5 years ago

Apologies for the late reply to your helpdesk query!

If a sequence is shorter than the 8 amino acids under consideration (three positions downstream and 4 positions upstream of each investigated position), or if a potential cleavage site is encountered at or near the termini, the input sequence is completed with "X" residues which cause it to match any amino acid.

This results in a different behaviour for "positive" conditions such as "P1' must be a G" and for "negative" conditions such as "P1' must not be D or E" (as in the 2 cleavage rules for Thrombin), and explains what you observed.

I agree that this may seem slightly problematic. Does it cause problems for your use case? Which is the behaviour you (or others) would expect?

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1624 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6