Fastq Format Problem When Using Bwa Aln -Q Option (Read Trim)
1
1
Entering edit mode
13.0 years ago
Bioscientist ★ 1.7k

This is kind of follow-up question of http://biostar.stackexchange.com/questions/14723/trim-the-low-quality-end-of-100bp-read

My paired-end reads are 100bp, and in Illumina 1.5+ format. Now I need to run like:

bwa aln -q 20

I'm just wondering do I need to first convert Illumina 1.5+ format to Sanger format? Or simply set -q 46 ? (Since Sanger format is phred+33; while Ilumina 1.5+ is phred+64)

Actually I'm a little bit confused about Sanger, Illumina 1.3, Illumina 1.5. What are these? Where do they come from?

Thanks

Edit: I just notice bwa aln has an "I" option, which converts Illumina 1.3 to sanger. But what about Illumina 1.5? Can it be applied to 1.5?

bwa trimming quality • 4.5k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
13.0 years ago

Here is a good thread on seqanswers about converting Illumina to Sanger quality scores.

Here is a good description of what the quality scores are: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FASTQ_format#Quality

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1465 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6