Hi all,
My data is two samples: tumor and normal, exome and whole genome sequencing data.
I have tried XHMM for CNV analysis, but it needs more than 2 samples, so I changed to CNVnator and CNVFinder, but they are very hard to install in my system since I do not have root access and centos needs many other libraies which are not installed in my system.
I used CNVseq too, but the outcome is not very good.
I used varscan2 to analyze CNV, but the outcome is not very good either.
So is there any other CNVtools for tumor-normal sample?
Many thanks!
lianhe
I am using varscan2 for exome CNV, and the result looks fine.
Can you tell/show why your result is not fine ?
Hi Chirag:
Thank you for reply!
Can I ask you how you analyze CNV for exome by varscan2 in detail?
When I use varscan2,I followed the recommonded pipeline in the varscan2 official website,which is:
1. Run VarScan copynumber on normal and tumor mpileup output
This will create a single output file,
varScan.copynumber
, containing the raw copynumber calls.2. Run VarScan copyCaller to adjust for GC content and make preliminary calls.
This will create two output files:
varScan.copynumber.called
(adjusted calls) andvarScan.copynumber.called.gc
(GC adjustment information). As of version 2.2.12 (August 2012), you can also specify an output file for candidate homozygous deletions.After the first step, I get
output.copynumber
file like:I do not know why all the
gc_content
is 0.After step 2, I got:
well, in my opinion,I think varscan2 just used the ratio between tumor and normal, and cut the threshold to identity them as amp or deletion or neutral. I do not think this is a good way to analyze CNV.
Maybe I do not know varscan2 very well, so please give me some advice.
Many thanks!
lianhe