Entering edit mode
12.9 years ago
Malachi Griffith
20k
Does anyone know of a good source of human genes that act as a tumor suppressor or oncogene? The source can be a database or data mining approach that queries a more general database.
Some possible features of a 'good' source:
- More than just a list of 'cancer genes'. One abstract with the name of the gene and the word cancer in it does not make it a convincing cancer gene. But a more sophisticated text-mining based approach would be acceptable
- The gene will be annotated as a tumor suppressor or oncogene with additional information on how this classification is justified
- Other relevant annotation such as whether the gene is involved in DNA repair, apoptosis, etc.
- Up to date. A spreadsheet from 10 years ago is less useful than a routinely updated source.
- Free and open source. Although if you know of commercial options please suggest them.
Here are some of the things I have found so far:
- The Wikipedia entries above list categories of oncogenes .. but not all RTKs for example will necessarily act as an oncogene
- The Gene Ontology used to have a term 'Tumor Suppressor' but this has been superseded by the term 'regulation of cell cycle'. A gene involved in regulation of the cell cycle may generally have the potential to function as a tumor suppressor but it would be nice to know which had been demonstrated to do so and how. A combination of GO terms and evidence codes might be acceptable if someone wishes to elaborate on this approach
- UniProtKB has a keyword 'Proto-oncogene' associated with 560 genes and a keyword 'Tumor Suppressor' associated with 631 genes.
- A compilation of cancer gene lists from the 'Bushman Lab'
- The Sanger Cancer Gene Census
- A more empirical approach might involve using patterns of somatic mutation across many cancers to identify likely tumor suppressors and oncogenes. Where tumor suppressors are expected to be characterized by loss-of-function mutations (copy number deletions, nonsense, or missense mutations spread across multiple sites in the gene) and oncogenes would be characterized by recurrent mutation sites (amplifications, mutation hotspots, gene fusions involving a particular gene partner, etc.). COSMIC is already working along these lines but if there are others, please post. The COSMIC Cancer Mutation Census is newer resource that perhaps addresses this question even more directly.
- The Cancer HotSpots Resource performs an analysis that looks for recurrently mutated cancer hotspots by mining tumor sequence data. These hotspots can be indicative that a gene is an Oncogene.
- CHASM-Plus is a nice resource that takes a machine learning approach to scoring driver mutations.
- A variety of older websites that list tumor suppressors: TSGDB, Tumor Gene Database, and TAG
Useful suggestions gathered from below (refer there for more details):
- Network of Cancer Genes
- NCI Cancer Gene Index
- Table of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes from Vogelstein et al. 2013
- MSKCC Cancer Genes Via Gene Ranker
- TSGene from Vanderbilt
Sources you could mine to develop your own lists:
- ICGC data portal
- TCGA data portal
- MSKCC cBioPortal
- IntOGen, Integrative Oncogenomics
- Broad, Tumor Portal
- Genomic Data Portal
Organizations that are annotating druggable/actionable genes:
- Washington University Genome Institute: DGIdb, DOCM, CIViC
- MD Anderson: PCT
- Vanderbilt: MyCancerGenome
- Dienstmann lab: GDKD
Some relevant posts:
- Web resources to find cancer indication where a given gene is amplified
- Where can I find mutation databases specialized in cancer?
- Where can I find Data sets of cancer publicly available?
- Mutated gene sequence database for breast cancer
- help in obtaining a cancer-related database
- List of known cancer resources
- Learning about cancer from the ground up...
- Sources of information about amplified genes (and overexpressed) in cancer
- Exploring cancer mutation data portals
I feel like, right now, the best answer to this question is the Cancer Gene Census. They currently provide a TSV download of their complete list of 567 genes with nearly all being indicated as oncogene and/or tumor suppressor (TSG).
I doubt that you have missed a useful resource given your fairly extensive groundwork. Interesting questions though, particular if there is no good solution to the problem yet.
haha I compiled that "Bushman Lab" list back in 2005. NCI was very disorganized - there was no Cancer Gene Index or lists to speak of. Today I think it would almost be easier to assemble a list of "non-cancer genes", since there are so many passenger mutations that can occur.
Yeah the passenger mutation comment is a good one. This is why I am interested in more context. As you say, virtually every gene cited in more than 5 papers is a 'cancer gene' and the remainder just aren't a cancer gene yet. What we need is more information on how each gene is related to cancer initiation, progression, metastasis, response to treatment, etc., etc.
If we need design a computational approach to systematically find if a gene, specially a cell cycle gene, is a suppressor or a oncogene, without mining a database, how would we go about analyzing the relevant data (mutations, CN, expression, miRNA)?
Please open a new question for this instead of using the answer field in an existing post. I moved it to a comment. To maximize your chance of a good answer when asking a new question, please read and follow How To Ask Good Questions On Technical And Scientific Forums