Hi,
Do you know which is the most Authoritative genomic regions for Promoter and Enhancer of Human genome?
I don't like the definition of promoter: 5K upstream of TSS
Enhancer: 10K upstream of Promoter
Thanks
Hi,
Do you know which is the most Authoritative genomic regions for Promoter and Enhancer of Human genome?
I don't like the definition of promoter: 5K upstream of TSS
Enhancer: 10K upstream of Promoter
Thanks
A good dataset of gene promoters come from the FANTOM5 project:
- http://fantom.gsc.riken.jp/5/data/
Their data is mainly derived with the CAGE technology, which sequences the first bases of a mRNAs.
Recommended readings:
RIKEN5 consortium. A promoter level mammalian expression atlas. Nature 2014 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v507/n7493/full/nature13182.html
RIKEN consortium. An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues. Nature 2014. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v507/n7493/full/nature12787.html
There isn't a genome-wide authoritative truth set. We know the absolute promoter and some enhancer sequences for some genes. We also have some evidence for where promoter and enhancer sequences may be based on things like DNAse I hypersenstive sites, transcription factor binding experiments, etc.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
These end up changing in every cell type and developmental stage. The "definitions" you posted were never intended to be anything more than vague generalizations.
Yes, I wouldn't even call them definitions. They are more the distance within which you expect to find promotor and enhancer sequences in general.
Yes. Promoter is cell specific. However, it can be considered as a promoter if it is defined as promoter in any kind of cell, I think. That means promoter would be a "union set" rather than “intersection set”