How to get rid of adapter contamination in the middle of the read
0
0
Entering edit mode
8.9 years ago
mrs.hope ▴ 10

Hello!
I have performed my first run on NextSeq 500 machine. I have ChIP-seq samples, pair-end reads, 40 bp long each. I am getting very weird FastQC results for my fastq files. For the first read I consistently have k-mers enrichment in the middle of the read (see pic attached), where k-mers correspond to Illumina Universal Adapter, and the second read look OK, sometimes adapters are a bit undertrimmed in the end of the read, but it is very rare. I wonder if it looks like adapter dimer contamination or not (my Bioanalyzer traces were perfect!) considering that the second read is OK. And what will be best to use to trim these adapter sequences? I tried cutadapt but it doesn't seem to improve the k-mers enrichment at all although it identifies about 1.7% of my reads as reads with adapters.

Many many thanks in advance!

Illumina NextSeq500 adapter contamination • 3.0k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Where is the pic ?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Were your libraries prepared following standard Illumina protocols (that is, adapters are expected to be found 3')? Did you try mapping the second read from the corresponding read 1 with adapters in the middle? Did you try the -b flag for cutadapt? Also, see here and here for other comments.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2015 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6