Module to RMSD two proteins with Python?
4
0
Entering edit mode
8.9 years ago
bef1 • 0

I have two protein structures in PDB format. The two structures refer to two conformations of the same protein. I want to calculate the RMSD between them.

Is there Python module that will allow me to do this?

python protein-structure • 18k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Hello j.cossio.diaz!

It appears that your post has been cross-posted to another site: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34534589

This is typically not recommended as it runs the risk of annoying people in both communities.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
You can try pymol or tm align
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
You can try pymol or tm align
ADD REPLY
2
Entering edit mode
7.7 years ago
crooveck ▴ 20

You can use PyMOL to calculate alignment. To do this follow this steps:

  1. run PyMOL
  2. type this command to load your proteins: fetch pdbId1 and fetch pdbId2 *
  3. Use command: rms_cur pdbId1, pdbId2 to calculate RMSD value betweend your structures

--

*where pdbId1 and pdbId2 is identifier of your protein in PDB database.

ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
8.9 years ago

Hi j.cossio.diaz

I struggled with the same problem and i find two module which can solve structural protein alignment in python.

  1. Please take a look to the link: https://github.com/charnley/rmsd

    You can explore the algorithm by using examples, which are exist in the zip file. The only think you have to do is extract the "ATOMS" with x,y,z coordinates from PDB files.

  2. There is also a tool call biopython, which have a Bio.PDB module to align PDB files. here is the link: http://combichem.blogspot.com.tr/2013/08/aligning-pdb-structures-with-biopython.html

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
7.7 years ago
Joe 21k

A UCSF Chimera option:

(Taken from a more complicated script I wrote for use with pychimera here: script, pychimera)

NB, pychimera takes a little more involved installation compared to pymol, but I really like it.

The code below should work inside chimera's python interpreter though I believe with no extra configuration.

from MatchMaker import (match,
                        CP_BEST,
                        GAP_OPEN,
                        GAP_EXTEND,
                        defaults,
                        MATRIX,
                        ITER_CUTOFF)

chimera.openModels.open(model1,type="PDB")
chimera.openModels.open(model2,type="PDB")

all_models = chimera.openModels.list(modelTypes=[chimera.Molecule])
mod0 = all_models[0]
mod1 = all_models[1]

for atoms1, atoms2, rmsd, fullRmsd in match(CP_BEST,[mod0, mod1],defaults[MATRIX],
                                            "nw",defaults[GAP_OPEN],defaults[GAP_EXTEND]):

   mol0_name = atoms2[0].molecule
   mol1_name = atoms1[0].molecule
   printmol0_name.name + "\t" + mol2_name.name + "\t" + str(rmsd))
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
7.7 years ago
Eric T. ★ 2.8k

In Biopython, the Bio.SVDSuperimposer class will quickly align the two PDB structures and compute the RMSD. See this Bio.PDB FAQ, and search the page for "RMSD", or read the PDB section of the Biopython tutorial.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Hi, I know this might be very late to comment to it, but Bio.SVDSuperimposer does not seem to rotate the proteins to get the lowest RMSD: i get RMSD = 0.2 for chains that when aligned in PyMOL give RMSD = 0.06

here is my code:

fixed = Bio.PDB.Selection.unfold_entities(Bio.PDB.Polypeptide.PPBuilder().build_peptides(Bio.PDB.PDBParser(QUIET = True).get_structure('X' , '1A00_B.pdb') , aa_only = True)[0], 'A')
moving = Bio.PDB.Selection.unfold_entities(Bio.PDB.Polypeptide.PPBuilder().build_peptides(Bio.PDB.PDBParser(QUIET = True).get_structure('X' , '1A00_D.pdb') , aa_only = True)[0], 'A')

sup = Bio.PDB.Superimposer()
sup.set_atoms(fixed , moving)
print(sup.rms)
sup.apply(moving)
print(sup.rms)


OUTPUT:
0.199679715722
0.199679715722

the "sup.apply(moving)" line does not seem to do anything.

Is this the correct way to find the RMSD between two structures in Biopython? is there a better script to write? or a better module to use than Biopython?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

The RMS in Bio.PDB.Superimposer is calculated using transformed coordinates, so it shows the RMS of the final superimposed result, not the RMS between input arrays.

By the way, your code is not a correct way to test change of RMS, because .apply function doesn't change anything inside Superimposer class, it just applies computed transformation matrix to the argument. The coordinates you provide to .set_atom method are copied to numpy arrays inside Superimposer class, so any change to them after that won't affect Superimposer members.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1705 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6