Entering edit mode
9.1 years ago
haiying.kong
▴
360
We have whole exome sequencing data for 16 FFPE samples. I ran FastQC on the data to decide if FFPE samples are also usable for our study.
Per_base_N_content
and Kmer_Content
are very poor. Overrepresented_sequences
is pretty poor as well.
Could any one please tell me if
- Data with this quality is not worth of further analysis?
- FFPE samples are not good for WES? We should stop sequencing FFPE samples?
Per_base_sequence_quality Per_tile_sequence_quality Per_sequence_quality_scores Per_base_sequence_content Per_sequence_GC_content Per_base_N_content Sequence_Length_Distribution Sequence_Duplication_Levels Overrepresented_sequences Adapter_Content Kmer_Content
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 -1
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 -1
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 -1
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 -1
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 -1
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 -1
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 -1
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 -1
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 -1
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 -1
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 -1
1 1 1 0 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 -1
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 -1
1 1 1 0 1 -1 1 1 0 1 -1
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 -1
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 -1
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 -1
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 0 1 0
1 1 1 0 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 -1
You have to link the results of FastQC directly or provide screenshots in order to get reasonable answers. "Poor" is not descriptive enough.