Entering edit mode
9.5 years ago
mehran.karimzade
▴
220
Using bwa-meth for whole genome bisulfite sequencing, I found that reads are shown in black.
Same file analyzed by Bismark, has grey colour reads az expected.
Example of reads:
BWA-meth file Ex_1:
HWI-ST762:353:C5PD6ACXX:7:2202:10147:48446 163 chr1 10005 12 99M = 10092 145 CCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCT BBBFFFFFFFFFFF<BFFFIBFFFBFFFIFIFBFFFIFFIIFFBFFIIIBFFFFFI'7<BFF7BFFFFBBBBBB0<BBBB0777BBBB7BBBBBBBBBB YC:Z:GA MD:Z:99 YD:Z:r PG:Z:MarkDuplicates RG:Z:HI.2280.007.Index_3.SE_pair_val_ NM:i:0 AS:i:99 XS:i:99
Bismark-bowtie2 Ex_2:
HWI-ST762:353:C5PD6ACXX:4:2102:15861:95520/1 163 chr1 10005 42 99M = 10059 105 CCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCT BBBFFFFFFFBFBFFFFIIFBFFFIIIF<FBFFFIFFFBFBBFFFFFFFIIBF<FB<<BF0B'77BBF<77<BB<BBBBB<B<7<<77B7<B7BBB7B< MD:Z:99 PG:Z:MarkDuplicates.2 XG:Z:GA NM:i:0 XM:Z:................................................................................................... XR:Z:GA
The only difference I noticed is the fact that pair information is not available in bwa-meth output. However as you see in the screenshot, IGV is able to find reads. I would appreciate any input on what might be the reason.
Many thanks
Mehran
The pairing information is there in both, but the methylation call string isn't there for bwa-meth (it doesn't produce it). Perhaps that's the reason IGV is treating the alignments differently.
You are right. I got this from Jim Robinson IGV mailing list:
Thanks
good to know
Is the YC tag used by other tools downstream? Can it be changed to another tag with no consequences?