Entering edit mode
9.1 years ago
fire_water
▴
80
Hello. I have a user that needs to use Bowtie 0.12.7 (Yeah, old version. Don't ask.) but the quality score format of our FASTQ files is Sanger / Illumina 1.9. I see this version of Bowtie defaults to:
--phred33-quals input quals are Phred+33 (default)
My questions are:
Since the FASTQ files are using the most recent quality score format, will this version of Bowtie know how to handle that?
If not, where can I find a command-line version of a FASTQ Groomer, like the one in Galaxy?
I appreciate your help.
Thank you. Do you recommend I convert the Q-score in this specific case or just feed the FASTQ files directly to Bowtie instead?
Since your Q scores are already in Sanger format no need to convert.
Thanks. My only concern is if Bowtie 0.12.7 encounters a "J" in the quality score, will it know how to convert that? Illumina 1.8+ uses "J" whereas Sanger does not. So not sure what'll happen.
You can align and see what happens. I have a feeling it might work. There are not going to be many bases with J scores.
If bowtie encounters an error (and you have to use this older version) then you could set those J values to one level lower.
Your feeling was correct! Bowtie 0.12.7 handled two test sequences with quality scores set to all Js. Thanks again for your help :)