Hello everyone,
can I use RNA-seq data from 3 tissues each having 3,3,2 biological replicates and NO technical replicates to identify novel transcripts using cufflinks RABT based assembly?
if not then how many replicates do i need? Thank You.
Hello everyone,
can I use RNA-seq data from 3 tissues each having 3,3,2 biological replicates and NO technical replicates to identify novel transcripts using cufflinks RABT based assembly?
if not then how many replicates do i need? Thank You.
The isoform analysis itself is bit tricky. If you are going to discover some novel isoform, I would not recommend to just use cufflinks (though good for finding novel genes). You have to try using some specific method for isoform discovery, some useful posts
A: What is best tool to call diferentially expressed isforms ?
For sequencing I would recommend paired-end strand specific sequencing with more depth (This should compensate the need for more replicates).
Thanks for your reply.
yes it is paired end data and other things are also ok.
i was just thinking how can i say whether it is a novel transcript or not? If cufflinks reports this transcript in majority of biological replicates(eg. in 2 out of 3 or 3 out of 3 biological replicates it is present) only then?
and what is this long RNA-seq(>200 nt long)?
It has been discussed already and this post might be useful for you.
Rna-Seq: Novel Transcripts Found. What Next?
For long RNA-seq refer,
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
I think that sequencing depth is more critical than replicates for novel transcripts discovery so only 3 or 2 replicates might not be the biggest issue for you.
Thanks for your reply.
yes it is paired end data and other things are also ok.
i was just thinking how can i say whether it is a novel transcript or not? If cufflinks reports this transcript in majority of biological replicates(eg. in 2 out of 3 or 3 out of 3 biological replicates it is present) only then?
I agree with Carlo, depth will be more important than replicates. This paper might also be of interest to you: http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/01/29/038224