I first built the terence with the following command
rsem-prepare-reference --bowtie reference_hg19.fa hg19_ref
And then ran the following:
rsem-calculate-expression --paired-end PairedEnd1.fastq PairedEnd2.fastq hg19_ref my_test_sample
After running for about 20 hours, all I got was the following output:
---------------------------------------------------- start ----------------------------------------------------
bowtie -q --phred33-quals -n 2 -e 99999999 -l 25 -I 1 -X 1000 -p 1 -a -m 200 -S hg19_ref -1 PairedEnd1.fastq -2 PairedEnd2.fastq | samtools view -S -b -o my_test_sample.temp/my_test_sample.bam -
Warning: Exhausted best-first chunk memory for read NS500144:471:HVFYMBGXX:1:12107:15053:9521 1:N:0:CAGAGAGG/1 (
patid 4851744); skipping read
Warning: Exhausted best-first chunk memory for read NS500144:471:HVFYMBGXX:1:21109:16613:17366 1:N:0:CAGAGAGG/1
(patid 13368267); skipping read
Warning: Exhausted best-first chunk memory for read NS500144:471:HVFYMBGXX:2:13106:13072:15868 1:N:0:CAGAGAGG/1
(patid 33771310); skipping read
Warning: Exhausted best-first chunk memory for read NS500144:471:HVFYMBGXX:2:21111:9396:9031 1:N:0:CAGAGAGG/1 (p
atid 38469910); skipping read
Warning: Exhausted best-first chunk memory for read NS500144:471:HVFYMBGXX:2:23211:19862:18298 1:N:0:CAGAGAGG/1
(patid 48288092); skipping read
---------------------------------------------------- end ----------------------------------------------------
So I cancelled it.
It was ran on a server which had over 300GB memory, so I don't think it's the problem of the physical memory we have. Anyone has any idea?
Thanks a lot in advance!
-- m.x.
Hi, maybe you can search it here : https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/rsem-users
Very helpful, and I joined the RSEM users google group. Thank you!
I reran rem-calculate-expression with added parameter "-p 8", but go the same warning for the "chunk memory".
-p
option is for cores to use. Option you want to change would be--bowtie-chunkmbs <int>
Default is 64 MB so set it to something bigger.What <int> would you suggest? Some people use 256, but why not set it to even bigger, say, 1024?
Thanks!