Ribosomal proteins differentially expressed?
0
0
Entering edit mode
8.3 years ago

Hi,

I have data from human tissue biopsies with different diseases. My pipeline was fastqc - trimmomatic - fastqc - star - featurecounts - voom/limma. I removed rRNAs during library prep, and from the Ensembl annotation gtf during the featurecounts step.

Now, I am puzzled to get quite a lot of ribosomal proteins as differentially expressed. I understand that these are not rRNAs, but I have never seen so many in one place.

Should I be worried, or could this be normal biology?

Cheers

RNA-Seq • 4.9k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode

Protein synthesis is often altered during stress. I think it has biological meaning and is not a technical artifact (I have seen it a lot in expression studies).

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks for your quick reply. I also found some papers that describe functions in inflammation etc. for these transcripts. They only make up roughly a third of my list, so I was wondering...

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

It might be a result of bad normalization of the counts. If it's biologically reasonable that there are different number of ribosomes in one condition over the other then it should be valid, otherwise you might see this change while they didn't change because some other proteins changed expression level in the opposite direction and the normalization process missed it. I recommend you to run it with DESeq2 and see if this is reproducible with their normalization.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Did you perform any size-factor normalization? It's certainly biologically possible, but in the steps above you don't mention any steps that would adjust for sample size differences. This would also be an easy way in which the differences could appear.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I used edgeR to introduce the different library sizes (without an extra argument, so it should take the total counts). See code below. Alternatively, I get relatively large (judging from my experience with limma and arrays) weights (some >2 fold). Could this be a problem, too?

x <- DGEList(counts = counts$counts, genes=counts$annotation)

isexpr <- rowSums(cpm(x) > 75) >= 25

x <- x[isexpr,]

design <- model.matrix(~1+ targets$var1 + targets$var2)

y <- voomWithQualityWeights(x,design,plot=F, normalize="quantile")

Many thanks!

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1987 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6