Question about potentially mutation causing protein
1
0
Entering edit mode
8.1 years ago
M K ▴ 660

Is the following chunk of protein sequence, cause any mutation. I didn't find enough information about this protein. I know it easy to search for it using available database, but the issue here I didn't find source with full details.

GEMVTKAKCKFCYKLYVYQPGGPTSQLNRHLDKCTAYQNKLANAKSKVAQGTISFALDDGSLVVNPTEYD LDMEDDFSLSLSSEDGGSQGEDEVHNAKRGVKRAKGDVPLSPSKCKVKRVKRADCWKYFKVVEVQSKKKF GEMVTKAKCKFCYKLYVKRAKGDVPLSPSKCKVKRVKRADCWKYFKVVEVISFALDDGSLVVNPTEYD HDHTRNLIAKMIIVHEYSLRMVEHRWFNILMKWMNN

gene genome blast • 2.3k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

what was the result of aligning this protein against the database?

maybe it is uncharacterized protein of maize or rice?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I used blastp, and it gave me long matching

this is the first one with the following information 236 236 78% 1e-73 59% CAE75980.1 wich is : B1160F02.11 [Oryza sativa Japonica Group] GenBank: CAE75980.1

the second one 243 243 85% 3e-72 58% BAF04701.2 the third one 182 182 78% 7e-50 47% XP_015624332.1 I don't know which one will be the accurate one regarding the coverage %. Also there are 4 others befor those in the blast list and the first one is uncharacterized and the other 3 are hypotheticals

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

How are we supposed to help you with a protein that you do not seem to know much about either :)

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Have you tried blat'ing the sequence using the UCSC BLAT search?

http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgBlat

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

That appears to be a plant sequences based on a couple of posts above.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

So the question here what is the specific name of this protein. if the named or accession number is known it will be easy to look for more details about it

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

No offense but this is not an exercise/homework question, correct?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

No it is not. I am just curious about it. what I found so far it is uncharacterized corn protien

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Try Blast search over at Uniprot.org. Appears to be a plant (rice) protein.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Do you mean for Japanese rice

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Oryza genus at least (which will include rice). Based on the hits you only appear to have a fragment of the total protein (~40%).

Why do you expect this to be mutagenic and to which organism?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Based on the domain for it which include Zinc finger which play a role for binding DNA, I expect may cause mutation, but so far I don't know what is it.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Yeah. For whatever reason, I just assume every protein in the universe is human. Need my caffeine fix.

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode
8.1 years ago
Michael 55k

Using NCBI Blastp we find the best match as given below, 100% seq identity, full query coverage, only the first 10 AA missing. The next best hit is not as good. So I guess it is reasonable to assume that this sequence "is" from Corn XP_008680584.1

You can read more about the BED Zinc finger domain here: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/entry/IPR003656 The main biological function of Zinc finger domains is to bind DNA, this could be a regulatory protein, transcription factor, or transposase, and there you also have your potential for mutagenesis.

PREDICTED: uncharacterized protein LOC103655641 [Zea mays]
Sequence ID: XP_008680584.1Length: 257Number of Matches: 1
Related Information
Gene-associated gene details
Map Viewer-aligned genomic context
Range 1: 11 to 257GenPeptGraphicsNext MatchPrevious Match
Alignment statistics for match #1
Score   Expect  Method  Identities  Positives   Gaps
518 bits(1334)  0.0 Compositional matrix adjust.    247/247(100%)   247/247(100%)   0/247(0%)
Query  1    SLGSRSRTRTKQLTKKPPISMQKMHATTASSASGNRSNVSISVEPTTNSREEEDKDEDNS  60
            SLGSRSRTRTKQLTKKPPISMQKMHATTASSASGNRSNVSISVEPTTNSREEEDKDEDNS
Sbjct  11   SLGSRSRTRTKQLTKKPPISMQKMHATTASSASGNRSNVSISVEPTTNSREEEDKDEDNS  70

Query  61   LDMEDDFSLSLSSEDGGSQGEDEVHNAKRGVKRAKGDVPLSPSKCKVKRVKRADCWKYFK  120
            LDMEDDFSLSLSSEDGGSQGEDEVHNAKRGVKRAKGDVPLSPSKCKVKRVKRADCWKYFK
Sbjct  71   LDMEDDFSLSLSSEDGGSQGEDEVHNAKRGVKRAKGDVPLSPSKCKVKRVKRADCWKYFK  130

Query  121  VVEVQSKKKFGEMVTKAKCKFCYKLYVYQPGGPTSQLNRHLDKCTAYQNKLANAKSKVAQ  180
            VVEVQSKKKFGEMVTKAKCKFCYKLYVYQPGGPTSQLNRHLDKCTAYQNKLANAKSKVAQ
Sbjct  131  VVEVQSKKKFGEMVTKAKCKFCYKLYVYQPGGPTSQLNRHLDKCTAYQNKLANAKSKVAQ  190

Query  181  GTISFALDDGSLVVNPTEYDHDHTRNLIAKMIIVHEYSLRMVEHRWFNILMKWMNNSYES  240
            GTISFALDDGSLVVNPTEYDHDHTRNLIAKMIIVHEYSLRMVEHRWFNILMKWMNNSYES
Sbjct  191  GTISFALDDGSLVVNPTEYDHDHTRNLIAKMIIVHEYSLRMVEHRWFNILMKWMNNSYES  250

Query  241  IGRKTKK  247
            IGRKTKK
Sbjct  251  IGRKTKK  257
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Interesting you find something other than what OP did (your blast flavor/choice of DB must be different). This is a predicted protein based on the genome sequence, so if it is real would need experimental investigation.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I simply pasted the sequence into NCBI blast, not sure what can go wrong with that. Maybe op used local blast with a custom db.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Also there are 4 others befor those in the blast list and the first one is uncharacterized and the other 3 are hypotheticals

I thought the OP did. I also got this uncharacterized protein using default param and db, but didn't respond with the assumption that OP found it and wasn't interested.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2467 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6