Thanks for your answer! I already got the genetic map provided by USCS database with STS markers. But my issue remains the same: the density of markers of the available genetic maps (the USCS one or HapMap II one) is much lower than the density of my SNP set. For example I have 4054 SNPs between the 2 STS markers above (in your comment).
Therefore I don't know how to attribute to each SNPs of my set a position in cM without doing a very important approximation.
Anyway, what do you suggest? To use a rule of three approach to attribute a cM position to my collection's SNPs?
Thanks for your advice!
Pierre
ADD COMMENT
• link
updated 13 months ago by
Ram
44k
•
written 14.8 years ago by
Pierre
▴
500
0
Entering edit mode
I doubt you can get better resolution since centimorgan is experimental unit for recombination frequency. It does not correlate well with base pairs, which depends on genomic position. In human it approximately 1 Mbp in average.
FYI, I could not get that link to work but has now been changed to: ftp://ftp.hapmap.org/hapmap/recombination/2008-03_rel22_B36/rates/