Illumina fastq lane output
2
0
Entering edit mode
7.7 years ago
sacha ★ 2.4k

When I convert bcl to fastq (with bcl2fastq), by default I get several fastq file by sample AND by lane. For instance :

PAN150427_S17_L001_R1_001.fastq
PAN150427_S17_L002_R1_001.fastq
PAN150427_S17_L003_R1_001.fastq
PAN150427_S17_L004_R1_001.fastq

Is there any reason to not merge all lanes into one by default ? From this workflow http://www.htslib.org/workflow/, it seems they merge fastq lane after alignment. Is it really necessary ?

illumina fastq bcl • 3.2k views
ADD COMMENT
3
Entering edit mode
7.7 years ago
GenoMax 147k

Keeping them separate allows you to work on the files in parallel speeding things up. You could merge the results files at a later step.

You could use --no-lane-splitting option with bcl2fastq v.2.18.x to get a single file per sample, if you prefer that.

ADD COMMENT
2
Entering edit mode
7.7 years ago
igor 13k

Some reasons for not merging:

  • You (and anyone who might later work with your data) always knows how many lanes you ran. Although this may sound ridiculous for those who are keeping good records, it's a recurrent problem for many labs.
  • If one of the lanes failed or had some issues, it's easy to take those sequences out.
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1908 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6