Hello
I saw this great post about how someone has plotted the growth rate of the trace archive. Given all the articles talking about the bioinformatics data deluge/tsunami/bonanza I was suprised to see the growth curve decreasing. Just in case I was going mad I searched the page for the word 'log' to make sure it wasn't a log plot showing exponential growth. Is there any particular reason why growth rate is decreasing in this archive? I just though this was interesting and wondered if anyone had any comments
thanks a lot
I find that comment snide. Is that in-keeping with the general ethos of the scientific community? I'm not from a biology background and I did not realise the point Daniel kindly elucidated below. I'm not sure why you needed to go out of your way to type a comment to belittle me.
yeah and why aren't more new MIDI ringtones coming out these days?
I find that comment sneyd. Is that in-keeping with the general ethos of the scientific community? I'm not from a biology background and I did not realise the point Daniel kindly elucidated below. I'm not sure why you needed to go out of your way to type a comment to belittle me.
my apologies. here's the deal though - no archive can really hope to hold 1TBp runs which are coming from present-day NGS sequencers. They will either hold an alignment, or SNP calls, or an assembly, but they cannot store or serve that much raw data.