Entering edit mode
7.5 years ago
Hughie
▴
80
Hello!
Recently, I'm learning about RNA-seq quatification and I found there are many normalization methods, such as, CMP,RPKM/FPKM,TPM,TMM etc. After reading some papers about them, I noticed that all of these units mentioned above can't compare directly between samples because they just get relative expression instead of absolute expression.
I have just heard about spike-in method which may not be a proper method to get absolute expression, so, I want to ask you whether there exsits or you have imaged a proper expression unit to get absolute expression or compare between samples.
Thanks for your suggestion!
I believe spike-ins are used just to check that housekeeping genes are expressed in the correct proportions so are not appropriate for quantification.
TPM I believe is the most robust metric
As long as the samples come from the same experiment then they should be directly comparable because I would assume that the data has been generated the same way for each. Even if from different experiments, you would still use these metrics, but you would have to check that the experimental generation of the data was similar. You are far safer if you know that those that generated the data used spike-ins.
Thank you! But, I'm thinking that TPM just measures relative expression, so ,if sampleA has a gene1 which has reads number much larger than the same gene1 of sampleB,(supoose 1000 vs 10),so,will this dramaticlly changed expression effect other genes because of 'relative'.