I detected the following variant and annotated it with Annovar (using hg19 ref. genome):
Chr: 17
Start: 7579472
Ref.: G
Alt: C
dbSNP: rs1042522
AAChange.ensGene: ENSG00000141510:ENST00000359597:exon3:c.C215G:p.P72R
The AAChange fits with the dbSNP entry (both C>G and Pro>Arg), but differs with my Ref. and Alt (they are inverted). Also when I load my ref. genome into IGV, the position falls into a CGG codon that codes for Arg. Replacing the G by C produces a CGC codon that also codes for a Arg, not a Pro.
Why the annotation is inverted compared to my Ref./Alt.?
* EDIT *
Wildtype:
sense CGG
^
antisense GCC ==> Pro
Mutant:
sense CGC
^
antisense GCG ==> Ala
(the "^" indicates the mutation position on the sense strand, i.e. 17:7579472)
Harold, it makes sense for the codon encoding Pro but not for the mutant that would code for Ala in this case (see edit on the OP). I am clearly missing something...
LMGTFY: dbSNP rs=1042522
I saw that. Does not answer the question
Actually, it does. The SNP is in the second nucleotide of the codon, not the third as your edit indicates. Your positioning may be off due to zero-based vs one-based counting.