I usually do samtools flagstat to represent the mapping stats. Is there any best way to represent/present the mapping quality/results in details.
I usually do samtools flagstat to represent the mapping stats. Is there any best way to represent/present the mapping quality/results in details.
Most aligners have a decent mapping summary log. You could rely on these, or you can try RSeQC's bam_stat.py.
I'm usually not using samtools flagstat, since it is summarising rather alignments not reads.
For comparing different samples, you can use multiQC.
I can't tell you specifically but I find it is a good exercise to read current sequencing publications and see how they present their mapping stats. I am always looking for nicer ways to present boring numbers like that.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Did someone ask you for something in particular in relation to alignment?