Hi all,
I used VEP from Ensembl to annotate a list of SNP derived from whole genome sequencing of a population. When I examined some of them, I found there are some differences between VEP output and what "variation" section of ensembl showed us. For example, the strand for rs104895094 determined minus (-1) while it is forward at enter link description here. Also, VEP used "A" as an alternative allele to calculate the consequence while the minor allele is C for this SNP at enter link description here. Could you please tell me what is the story?
Sorry, please kindly let me know is it right to say variant allele, alternative allele, and the minor allele is the same when AF is < 0.5?
Many thanks
1) Regarding discrepancy about strand information between dbSNP (rs) and Ensembl - Gene is on reverse strand and variant location is represented on forward strand (on ensembl). dbSNP (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/rs104895094) lists gene on reverse strand.
2) VEP uses the allele provided by user input. However, for a variant (existing on ensembl), it provides consequences for all the alleles. In this case A and C. Click on HGVS names for this variant and you would see consequence calculation for both alleles and there are about 46 variant HGVS representations for this variant. ( http://asia.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Variation/Explore?r=16:3242903-3243903;v=rs104895094;vdb=variation;vf=18790831)
3) As per VEP annotation of your data, we would not know what happened if you do not furnish problematic variant information.