log vs square-root transformation
0
2
Entering edit mode
6.0 years ago
igor 13k

Traditionally, people log-transform expression data. I recently saw someone square-root transform their data. Is there a reason that method is not more widely used? One of the clear benefits is that it will work with 0s, so there is no need to add a pseudocount to the entire matrix, which will disproportionally impact the low values.

RNA-Seq normalization • 6.6k views
ADD COMMENT
2
Entering edit mode

I guess log transformation more efficiently takes care of large differences in read counts.

enter image description here

Adding a tiny pseudocount like 0.1 probably does not really harm any downstream analysis, because low counts will still be low and lack power for differential analysis and high counts will not effectively be changed.

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

Log transform symmetrizes under-expression and over-expression representations.

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2350 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6