Suspicious feature from 16S rRNA gene analysis using archaeal primers
1
0
Entering edit mode
5.4 years ago
will.wcb ▴ 20

One of the top features in our 16S sequencing is very suspicious. It was not even classified to domain level using sklearn in QIIME2 on the Silva 132 database. When I blast the sequence there are no hits except with quite low scores, ~48, and high E-vales. It is the exact length of the other, assignable features.

Any ideas what kind of artifact this could be? Or how we can look more into it?

Here is the sequence TAAAAGAGTTGCTGGCGAACGAAGGGCGTCCCGAAGCGACAGTAGATCCTGTTATCGAGGAAATATCGGCAACCGCCGTGGGCCTTACCTTCAAGATCGTAGAGGGTCCCCGGTTCAGAGTCGCCGACATAGAGTTTGAAGGCAACACGGTCTTCTCGAGTTCTCACCTCAGAAAGAACATGAAGCTTGTGAAGAAAGTGGGTCTCCTGACCACCTTCAGCTCGAAGGACATCTACCACAAAGAAAAATTCGAAGCTGATCTTGATCGCCTCCGCGTGCTGGTATACGCCGATCAAGGCTATTTGAAAGCGAGGTTTGGAGAACCGCGAGTCGAGGAAGTAGGCAAAATCGGCAACTGGCTGCCGATCATCGGACACAAGGGCGAGGGGCTGAAGATCGTTGTTCCCGTCGAGGAAGGCCGCCAGTACCGCGCCGCAGAGGTGAAGGTTGAAGACAACACGGAGTTTACGGCCGAGGAAATCAAGGCAATCATTGGTCTCA

Edit: replaced sequence

16S • 882 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Sorry, I placed the wrong sequence, here is the correct one

TAAAAGAGTTGCTGGCGAACGAAGGGCGTCCCGAAGCGACAGTAGATCCTGTTATCGAGGAAATATCGGCAACCGCCGTGGGCCTTACCTTCAAGATCGTAGAGGGTCCCCGGTTCAGAGTCGCCGACATAGAGTTTGAAGGCAACACGGTCTTCTCGAGTTCTCACCTCAGAAAGAACATGAAGCTTGTGAAGAAAGTGGGTCTCCTGACCACCTTCAGCTCGAAGGACATCTACCACAAAGAAAAATTCGAAGCTGATCTTGATCGCCTCCGCGTGCTGGTATACGCCGATCAAGGCTATTTGAAAGCGAGGTTTGGAGAACCGCGAGTCGAGGAAGTAGGCAAAATCGGCAACTGGCTGCCGATCATCGGACACAAGGGCGAGGGGCTGAAGATCGTTGTTCCCGTCGAGGAAGGCCGCCAGTACCGCGCCGCAGAGGTGAAGGTTGAAGACAACACGGAGTTTACGGCCGAGGAAATCAAGGCAATCATTGGTCTCA

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

Blasting that with megablast don't have any significant hit, using blastn it gives the short hits that you described, so I guess is just contamination.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Please use ADD COMMENT/ADD REPLY when responding to existing posts to keep threads logically organized. SUBMIT ANSWER is for new answers to original question.

ADD REPLY
2
Entering edit mode
5.4 years ago
JC 13k

Blasting your sequence to NT, the best hit is a 16S from uncultured archaea (Score=641, Query cov=80%, E=6e-180, %identity=95.31%)

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2150 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6