Every time I've done a ChIP-Seq, or (as in this case) CLIP-Seq, analysis over the years, I have used the "input" samples and not used the "control" samples. Whenever I've had both, I would google the difference to see which I should use and everything always said to use the input in whichever case I've encountered. However, now I only have control samples and I don't have input samples and I'm not sure how to call peaks on them.
First of all, dumb question: what is the input sample? Is it the same as the sample that is passed through a column for enrichment via antibody, but it simply wasn't passed through the column? Or is it the sample run through a column that has only beads and no antibody?
The controls I have, as they were described to me, were run through a column that had beads and no antibody. I was going to use PEAKachu to call peaks, but I'm not sure what I should do differently with these control samples. Can anyone clear this up for me? I've been putting off trying to figure out the difference between input & control for years now.
That's reassuring. Thanks. Is there a way to assess how good a control/input is? I basically want to figure out whether I should suggest that they change their procedure to sequence the input as their control.