In Peak Calling, what is the input sample
1
0
Entering edit mode
5.3 years ago
rleach ▴ 180

Every time I've done a ChIP-Seq, or (as in this case) CLIP-Seq, analysis over the years, I have used the "input" samples and not used the "control" samples. Whenever I've had both, I would google the difference to see which I should use and everything always said to use the input in whichever case I've encountered. However, now I only have control samples and I don't have input samples and I'm not sure how to call peaks on them.

First of all, dumb question: what is the input sample? Is it the same as the sample that is passed through a column for enrichment via antibody, but it simply wasn't passed through the column? Or is it the sample run through a column that has only beads and no antibody?

The controls I have, as they were described to me, were run through a column that had beads and no antibody. I was going to use PEAKachu to call peaks, but I'm not sure what I should do differently with these control samples. Can anyone clear this up for me? I've been putting off trying to figure out the difference between input & control for years now.

CLIP-Seq ChIP-Seq • 1.3k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
5.3 years ago
colin.kern ★ 1.1k

From my understanding, a control ChIP-seq library is an umbrella term for all the libraries you're describing, and also including using a control antibody such as IgG. An input library is a specific type of control library that's essentially just making a library from a portion shearing/sonication output without using a control antibody. I'm actually not sure if these are generally put through a column with beads but no antibody, or just directly made into a library. I'm more on the computational side of things.

But regardless, in your peak calling analysis these should all be treated basically the same. However the control and/or input was created, it's supposed to act as a way to normalize your actual ChIP library against various biases that come from shearing, mappability, etc. So even if the software specifically asks for an input rather than the control, I would still provide whatever control you've generated even if it technically isn't an input library.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

That's reassuring. Thanks. Is there a way to assess how good a control/input is? I basically want to figure out whether I should suggest that they change their procedure to sequence the input as their control.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1800 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6