The main idea of this technology is introduced in this paper:
Comprehensive Genome-wide Protein-DNA Interactions Detected at Single-Nucleotide Resolution
It seems can give better result than ChIP-seq.
However, there are much fewer regions that a tag can map to, which leads to a lot of redundant reads.
I don't think only single read should be kept if redundant ones exist.. However, I also think use a maximum number (for example, 5) is also arbitrary. (If there's a distribution model, it would be more reasonable) I saw several threads about how to deal with redundant reads, but didn't find anyone solve it. Does anyone have any idea about that?
@samuthing: Are you in a position to suggests modifications to the protocol? In short, you can add a degenerate barcode to the reads in order to combat PCR artifacts/amplicons. I can elaborate in an answer if it would be helpful.
@Steve Lianoglou:It's not about the protocol. Just for peak-calling, when I use MACS, I found it may be not very suitable for ChIP-exo experiment.. I'm working on Computational biology and don't quite understand why adding barcode can combat PCR artifacts. Could you explain a little more?