how to understand output form from CNVkit
0
1
Entering edit mode
5.0 years ago
prosium ▴ 20

I've had 300 WGS matched samples and ran 'batch function' from CNVkit with command below.

cnvkit.py batch WGS*Tumor.bam --normal WGS*Normal.bam --annotate refFlat_hg38.txt --fasta hg38.fa --output-reference ref.cnn --output-dir results --diagram --scatter -p 20 -m wgs

output format is below

ref.cnn
WGS_01_Normal.antitargetcoverage.cnn
WGS_01_Normal.targetcoverage.cnn
WGS_02_Normal.antitargetcoverage.cnn
WGS_02_Normal.targetcoverage.cnn
...

Is it right for these output? Ultimately do I have to check CNV for tumor samples?

And then, I ran again separately with reference post C: I got a problem with making normal reference using cnvkit

cnvkit.py coverage -p 4 WGS_01_Normal.bam hg38.target.bed -o WGS_01_N.targetcoverage.cnn
cnvkit.py coverage -p 4 WGS_01_Tumor.bam hg38.target.bed -o WGS_01_T.targetcoverage.cnn

they differ the results.

I got 2 questions.

1) Is it the same betwen 'batch' and each calculation?

2) If 'batch' is right, where is tumor coverage?

Thanks.

WGS CNV cnvkit • 1.1k views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1614 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6