Entering edit mode
4.8 years ago
blur
▴
280
Hi,
I am working on ribosome profiling - I downloaded, trimmed and aligned reads to rRNA using bowtie2, then took the unmapped reads and aligned them to the ucsc_hg19 reference with the hg19 gtf using TopHat2.
The thing is - there is a very low alignment rate (only 3498 reads were aligned). Which makes me think I did something wrong... I did a check with BWA mem to see if the rates are better - and they are much much higher. The cmd. is:
/nadata/software/tophat-2.0.12.Linux_x86_64/tophat2 -G ucsc_hg19.gtf -o ./ribo_bam -M -p 3 --no-novel-juncs -g 5 ./ucsc_hg19 4TopHat_reads.fastq
Can anyone tell me what I'm missing?
There is no reason to use tophat2 in this day and age, use STAR or another more modern aligner. Your alignment rates will likely be MUCH higher.
I am also planning to use HISAT, but was specifically asked to do TopHat2 as well (really not my choice) so that I could compare to a published dataset...
Either ignore requests like that or learn to say "no" to them, you're probably not getting paid to waste your and their time. It's better to reprocess published datasets.
words to live by, I'm sure :)