Filter Agilent Data
1
0
Entering edit mode
4.5 years ago
j_jamal96 ▴ 20

Hi everyone,

Could you please help me to know the answer to below question: What does this part of your Agilent data show ''AgilentData$other$gIsWellAboveBG"

My data has three different Cell-lines, each containing a resistant group and a sensitive group with two repetitions. My goal is compare the sensitive and resistant groups, I don't want to do the contrast between cell lines. Despite this fact, what number should I use for filtering

(Filt_Data <- rowSums (AgilentData $ other $ gIsWellAboveBG> 0)> = **????**)       *2, 3, ... ????*

If I want to do the contrast, would be different with this above mentioned number?

Thanks 💐

alignment gIsWellAboveBG Filter • 1.2k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
4.5 years ago

Hi,

The decision of which number to use is the analyst's choice. If your dataset has 16 samples, then you may choose a value of 8, so that only probes that have signal (above background noise) in >=50% (8 / 16 =~ 50%) samples are retained.

Kevin

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

NO, 12 samples ...

Cell line 1 Resistance 2 parebtal 2

Cell line 2 Resistance 2 parebtal 2

Cell line 3 Resistance 2 parebtal 2

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

12 samples - great. As the analyst, you can make the decision about which threshold to use.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I want to compare the resistant and sensitive groups of each cell-line, but I don't make the contrast between the cell-lines. So our analysis is divided into three separate sections (three cell-lines).

The AgilentData$other$gIsWellAboveBG matrix has 12 columns, that four of which related to a cell-line, respectively. so that only probes that have signal in >=50% (In each of the cell-lines) I used the following code for the filter ...

EProbe <- rowSums(y$other$gIsWellAboveBG[ , 1:4] > 0) >= 2 | rowSums(y$other$gIsWellAboveBG[ , 5:8] > 0) >= 2 | rowSums(y$other$gIsWellAboveBG[ , 9:12] > 0) >= 2

what is your idea?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I think that you may want to consider the logical operator of use:

  • | == OR
  • & == AND

Other than that, I do not see any problem.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1629 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6