Why are there soo many hits when using KOFAMSCAN?
1
0
Entering edit mode
3.9 years ago
O.rka ▴ 740

Has anyone tried using KOFAMSCAN? I feel like the data is useless unless I'm not using it correctly. There are literally SO many KOFAM hits per gene. What are your thoughts on this? Is it because I'm using it on a metagenomics dataset? It doesn't make sense that almost ever gene has so many hits for each gene. Check out the screenshot:

enter image description here

annotation protein metagenomics • 1.0k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
3.9 years ago
Mensur Dlakic ★ 28k

ATP-binding transporters are one of the largest and most promiscuous protein superfamilies - see here. Their overall structure is the same and is different mostly in parts that bind and recognize the substrate. That is a relatively small portion of the protein, so most if not all transporter proteins will have statistically significant hits to a number of HMMs. This is not just the case with KOFAMSCAN - if you translate that region into protein and search against Pfam or any other protein family database, you will get multiple hits as well. The same will be true for methyltransferases, dehydrogenases, alpha/beta hydrolases, SAM-radical enzymes, and many other large and functionally diverse proteins superfamilies.

In your case, top 5 or so hits indicate that this is likely a transporter for a small sugar molecule.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1878 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6