APT rma-sketch gene has same values as exon - Affymetrix Human Exon 1.0 ST Array
1
0
Entering edit mode
3.8 years ago
bjwiley23 ▴ 40

Hi, I have below code to summarize the exon and gene intensities. I am wondering why for 1 gene it has the same values (logged) as one of the probes so that when doing Gene-level Normalized intensity subtracting (since its logged) I'll get 0 for each sample. How is this the case that gene level intensity returned from APT is same as an exon?

#gene estimates (exon array)
apt-probeset-summarize \
-p /software/apt/lib/HuEx-1_0-st-v2.r2.pgf \
-c /software/apt/lib/HuEx-1_0-st-v2.r2.clf \
-b /software/apt/lib/HuEx-1_0-st-v2.r2.antigenomic.bgp \
--qc-probesets /software/apt/lib/HuEx-1_0-st-v2.r2.qcc \
-m /software/apt/lib/HuEx-1_0-st-v2.r2.dt1.hg18.core.mps \
-a rma-sketch \
--kill-list /software/apt/lib/Affymetrix_HuEx_1.0ST_Affected_probes_probesets.txt \
-o output-dir/gene \
/cels/exon/keep/*.CEL

#exon estimates (exon array)
apt-probeset-summarize \
-p /software/apt/lib/HuEx-1_0-st-v2.r2.pgf \
-c /software/apt/lib/HuEx-1_0-st-v2.r2.clf \
-b /software/apt/lib/HuEx-1_0-st-v2.r2.antigenomic.bgp \
--qc-probesets /software/apt/lib/HuEx-1_0-st-v2.r2.qcc \
-s /software/apt/lib/HuEx-1_0-st-v2.r2.dt1.hg18.core.ps \
-a rma-sketch \
--kill-list /software/apt/lib/Affymetrix_HuEx_1.0ST_Affected_probes_probesets.txt \
-o output-dir/exon \
/cels/exon/keep/*.CEL

An example is transcript_cluster_id 2315918

#gene
grep 2315918 rma-sketch.summary.txt
2315918 6.42343 6.51861 6.41761 6.48735 5.99480 6.52973 6.05458 6.88223 7.26753 6.37890

And one of the exons 2315941

#exon
grep 2315941 rma-sketch.summary.txt
2315941 6.42343 6.51861 6.41761 6.48735 5.99480 6.52973 6.05458 6.88223 7.26753 6.37890

This happened for more than 1 study (above is GSE18300) as well for this exact exon and transcript cluster so is it specific to a particular gene? This is for NM_001039211 // ATAD3C, exon id 439.

APT exon-array • 784 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
3.8 years ago

I am not sure how APT summarises the probe-level intensities but, in this case, 2315941 is a probeset_id that is related to the 2315918 transcript_cluster_id.

This transcript cluster ID has many other probe-set IDs related to it, including:

"probeset_id","seqname","strand","start","stop","probe_count","transcript_cluster_id","exon_id"
"2315920","chr1","+","1385169","1386029","4","2315918","424"
"2315921","chr1","+","1386073","1386138","4","2315918","425"
"2315922","chr1","+","1387426","1387450","1","2315918","426"
"2315923","chr1","+","1387750","1387814","4","2315918","427"
"2315926","chr1","+","1389542","1389630","4","2315918","428"
"2315927","chr1","+","1389749","1389852","4","2315918","429"
"2315928","chr1","+","1390851","1390898","4","2315918","430"
"2315929","chr1","+","1391192","1391220","2","2315918","431"
"2315930","chr1","+","1391606","1391725","4","2315918","432"
"2315933","chr1","+","1392523","1392558","4","2315918","435"
"2315934","chr1","+","1394542","1394601","4","2315918","436"
"2315935","chr1","+","1395784","1395808","1","2315918","437"
"2315936","chr1","+","1397917","1397968","4","2315918","438"
"2315937","chr1","+","1398015","1398046","4","2315918","438"
"2315938","chr1","+","1398052","1398077","2","2315918","438"
"2315939","chr1","+","1403811","1403838","4","2315918","439"
"2315940","chr1","+","1403973","1404058","4","2315918","439"
"2315941","chr1","+","1404605","1404917","4","2315918","439" <<-- HERE
"2315919","chr1","+","1381389","1381416","4","2315918","423"
"2315924","chr1","+","1387817","1387841","1","2315918","427"
"2315925","chr1","+","1387905","1387957","4","2315918","427"
"2315931","chr1","+","1391886","1391963","3","2315918","433"
"2315932","chr1","+","1392270","1392367","4","2315918","434"

I have put a 'HERE' where your probe-set of interest matches.

Depending on the level of sumarisation that you're doing, you should either get a single value for each probe-set ID, or else a single [summarised] value for the transcript cluster ID.

If you want, I can share R code with you so that you can have more control over this analysis. I'm really not sure how APT processes these.

Kevin

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1604 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6