Entering edit mode
11.6 years ago
Pappu
★
2.1k
I have constructed phylogenetic tree using NJ method in ClustalX and ML in PhyML. I also mapped my protein sequences belonging to NCBI taxons to the tree of life. Now I am wondering how to interpret the difference in tree structure obtained using these two methods.
Gene trees do not necessarily agree with the species tree due to duplications, losses and incomplete lineage sorting. As to different tree builders, they differ because their models are different and may focus on different information conferred by the data. The general consensus is that ML is better than NJ, though occasionally NJ may produce better trees.