Question

Forum:Bye Bye Bioinformatics : Another Small Result Of Mis-Conclusions And Results!!

2

Entering edit mode

11.7 years ago

Sukhi Singh 11k

Bye Bye, Bioinformatics

http://www.labtimes.org/labtimes/issues/lt2013/lt02/lt_2013_02_16_16.pdf

bioinformatics • 2.8k views

ADD COMMENT • link updated 22 months ago by Ram 44k • written 11.7 years ago by Sukhi Singh 11k

0

Entering edit mode

See also A farewell to bioinformatics

ADD REPLY • link 11.7 years ago by Martin A Hansen 3.0k

4

Entering edit mode

I know, that's why I wrote 'Another' in the title :)

ADD REPLY • link 11.7 years ago by Sukhi Singh 11k

score 6 · Answer 1 · 2013-05-07

6

Entering edit mode

11.7 years ago

Istvan Albert 102k

My reaction: only six out of ten were wrong? ... that's great! that means this person has four good papers, for papers that stood the test of time. That's reason to cheer not to complain.

ADD COMMENT • link 11.7 years ago by Istvan Albert 102k

0

Entering edit mode

Exactly, an optimistic view :)

ADD REPLY • link 11.7 years ago by Sukhi Singh 11k

0

Entering edit mode

For some half full bottle for some half empty, but how long before the remaining 4 will prove to be wrong?

ADD REPLY • link 11.7 years ago by zx8754 12k

score 1 · Answer 2 · 2013-05-07

1

Entering edit mode

11.7 years ago

Jeremy Leipzig 22k

This author seems to think there is some greater justice that is exacted on disproven scientists by an omniscient review committee. The chance you would encounter someone in a job interview who knows what is not reproducible, and would hold it against you, is very small. Having more papers is generally better as long as they are not redundant.