The SEQwiki doesn't have information about when the software was released. The wikipedia alignment list has that information, but it only about a subset of tools. The Open source wikipedia list is very under-populated.
That is what I thought.
If bioinformaticians are trying to curate lists of genes, proteins and ontologies can we really not curate a list of the tools we use?
Not quite a database of tools, but the journal Bioinformatics has an annual publication of new and updated Webtools and Databases. There is an associated database of databases that is discussed at the start of the database issue.
That is what I thought. If bioinformaticians are trying to curate lists of genes, proteins and ontologies can we really not curate a list of the tools we use?
There is already an ontology of the operations tools prefeform: http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/EDAM?p=summary
My point is that lists of software are neither useful nor desirable. And who wants to curate them? There is little if any reward.
Don't get me started on the worth of ontologies ;)