fastp results, per base content
1
0
Entering edit mode
3.6 years ago
minifoog ▴ 10

Should I be concerned with the per base ratio content despite having good quality scoring on every base position? Per base content

Quality score

fastp quality perbasecontent ubuntu • 1.7k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode

Going to leave a link for a blog post FastQC developers have on this very topic for future visitors to this thread. As Antonio said below nothing to worry about.

ADD REPLY
2
Entering edit mode
3.6 years ago

If you are concerned about the bias observed in the first 9 bases, that is absolutely normal in Illumina sequencing when a mechanical method of breaking the DNA to get the shotgun fragments in used. It turn out that DNA is more fragile in some sequences, and this is why you see it

It does not affect your analysis

I see in the second graphic a high quality even at the end

If you don't see GC bias and the presence of adapters and/or a high level of duplicated or overrepresented sequences, I would say that sequencing went just fine and you do not require to filter. You did not mention whether DNA or RNA is used

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1667 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6