Hi all,
during my Master Thesis, I had the luck to generate a certain amount of novel, valuable knowledge. This encompasses answers to 150 years of morphological uncertainties, high quality assembled coding sequences (and a proteome!), and a likely explanation for an absolutely out-there trait.
The topic however is fringe (to put it mildly). Additionally, it was not supported by funding. However,my PI had to substantially reorient the efforts of the entire group due to some extreme hardships in the last years. While this was managed masterfully, the project I was working for had to be terminated. As a result, my work will absolutely not be published in a peer-reviewed article. This is fine by me, as I'm planning to leave academia. However, because I love what I did, I'd love to make the findings of my Master Thesis public in some form.
I was thinking about publishing my findings as a blog. What do you think about that? Would you make your research public in such a way? What should be considered?
If it's novel and valuable then why don't you try to publish it as a non-open access journal article. Non-open access doesn't charge for publishing and if it's really an interesting topic then it might be accepted .
This is a good idea in general, but your statement that
Non-open access doesn't charge for publishing
is anything but general. There are plenty of closed access journal that still charge exorbitant fees.I sadly have to agree on that one. After my BA, my PI at the time and I crafted a publication from the BA's results. The journal (very low impact factor) charged our working group for publishing in closed-access. The PI however handled everything regarding submission/revision.
Getting all authors (I assume there will be more than just you, if you decide to write a paper) to a particular plan may be the more difficult part? Otherwise you now have options noted in this thread.
The writing may become a lonesome affair, as my PI has to keep the working group afloat with more relevant projects (those with actual funding). The former leader of the project (a postdoc) sadly passed away, hence the trouble/insecurity for going forward with the topic.
You are right. I think submitting a preprint to bioRxiv may be the best way forward from here on. If my PI gives his OK.