Should I look 1000 bases or 2000 bases upstream for promoters in humans
0
0
Entering edit mode
3.0 years ago
peter ▴ 20

I am looking to download promoters bed file from both UCSC and CAGE. I am trying to look into papers to see whether people usually go 1000 bases upstream or 2000 bases upstream. I keep on finding that usually people look 500-2000 bases upstream. But I am looking for an article where people may have used 'x' bases upstream. I haven't been able to find one. Can someone point me in the direction of some of those articles? Also, when looking upstream from CAGE peaks for promoters should I just get the midpoint of those peaks and then go 1000/2000 bases upstream or should I do it from the end like we do in UCSC. What would be a better idea here? I am sorry if this is a basic question. I am CS major and all of this is still very new to me.

bed CAGE promoter UCSC • 879 views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode

The truth is that there is no definition of how far you should be looking. Usually, it is a convention, demonstrated by how "round" that number is, 500 vs 1500 etc.

Design your pipeline so that the distance is tunable, read a few papers and evaluate what you observe. Then rerun your analysis in different ways. Try to make sense of the tradeoffs you see, sensitivity vs specificity etc.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thank you @Istvan for your answer.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1579 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6