gene body coverage interpretation
0
0
Entering edit mode
2.9 years ago
felipead66 ▴ 120

In search for possible 3'bias I have run gene_body_coverage.py and come up with a plot that assimilates the magenta plot in this example:

enter image description here

Does this mean there is 3'bias? What does the "shoulder" around 70 suggest?

rna-seq coverage • 1.7k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

For me, the magenta line is fine, there is no 3' bias at all. If by "shoulder", you mean the small bump around 70%, I don't think you should read too much into it. There is always some stochastic variation. Perhaps it can be explained by a small fragmentation bias but it is difficult to prove.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thank you for your reply. Is there an explanation why a group of samples follow the same line? In this case I am talking about magenta, blue, purple etc. In my case this is the trend as well. They comprise of the same cells with a different treatment. Is it normal to have the same trend in all plots?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

This is RNA-seq right ? In RNA-seq, highly expressed genes are over-represented in those kind of metaplots. Small sequence bias (GC content, etc...) in those genes affect their coverage, which explain the small variations, since those genes contribute for most of the average profile. Because in most conditions, the same genes are highly expressed, you have the same trend across conditions.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1738 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6