bcftools annotate 'unexpected end of file'
1
0
Entering edit mode
2.7 years ago
g.wang2 ▴ 10

Hi there,

I'm wondering if you may have encountered a similar issue below when using bcftools to re-annotate SNP IDs?

Example code:

./bcftools annotate -c ID -a 00-All.vcf.gz -Oz -o chr8_re-annotated.vcf.gz chr8.vcf.gz

I have tried to re-annotate some regions on chr2, 4, 8, 16 and 19. This has been successful for chr2, 4 and 16 but the command line above hung when it came to chr8 and 19. I had to terminate the run and noted the re-annotated vcf.gz files for chr8 and 19 have 'unexpected end of file'.

I would appreciate any views you have on this.

Guan

bcftools • 1.3k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

run gunzip -t 00-All.vcf.gz and gunzip -t chr8.vcf.gz to test your input files...

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks Pierre, I've just checked and both files passed integrity check. The per-chr vcf files were generated in one go before, and have been used for other analyses such as SNPTEST2 with no error. I'm puzzled with the current annotation run.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I had to terminate the run and noted the re-annotated vcf.gz files for chr8 and 19 have 'unexpected end of file'.

Some details are not clear to me, but if you terminated your bcftools annotate command while it was still running then writing of the results to the output file chr8_re-annotated.vcf.gz will have been interrupted resulting in an improperly formatted file. So it makes sense that downstream tasks that use chr8_re-annotated.vcf.gz as input would throw this 'unexpected end of file' error which is indicating a formatting issue.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Sorry, I see it's confusing.

Basically, the command line run on chr8 just hung there after some time (the new file size was not increasing any more). It didn't seem to finish after a long while, so I terminated it.

The same command line for chr2,4,16 run smoothly. I haven't been able to figure out why.

Just to add, I first filtered these chromosomes with bcftools prior to annotation (INFO>0.3 and MAF>0.05). These chromosomes were processed consistently at each step.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
2.7 years ago
g.wang2 ▴ 10

A quick update - I assigned more memory to run this job in the Slurm script, it works fine now.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1640 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6