Hi,
Can anyone please explain what the headers in the METAL-random (https://github.com/explodecomputer/random-metal) output mean? The header after I did random effect inverse variance meta-analysis in METAL-random gives the following:
MarkerName Allele1 Allele2 Freq1 FreqSE MinFreq MaxFreq Effect StdErr Pvalue Direction HetISq HetChiSq HetDf HetPVal EffectARE StdErrARE PvalueARE tausq StdErrMRE PvalueMRE
I am confused what PvalueARE and PvalueMRE mean and which is the p value to refer to for the random effect model? I checked the METAL website and the github page but couldn't find much info regarding the random effect output.
Pvalue I know should be for the fixed effect.
Thank you.
Information from here : https://github.com/MRCIEU/godmc_phase2_analysis
Fixed effects Effect StdErr pval
Heterogeneity stats : Direction HetISq HetChiSq (This is Q statistic) HetDf HetPVal tausq
Additive random effects (DerSimonian-Laird estimator) : EffectARE StdErrARE PvalueARE
Multiplicative random effects (The Effect size for this is the same as the Fixed effects) : StdErrMRE PvalueMRE
Thanks for the link.
Hi, posting this question here since it is relevant to METAL-Random: I am trying to carry out a random effect meta-analysis, but for some reason get exactly the same results as fixed effect meta-analysis and don't get the additional (expected) columns mentioned above. I guess the usual inverse variance weighted Fixed Effect meta-analysis was run.
Posting the script below for clarity:
The only option I replaced was the last row (where ANALYZE HETEROGENEITY was standing before). Maybe some of my options are overriding the last command?
Hope you can help me.
Rgds, Alessandro
I am not aware of a ANALYZE RANDOM command in the METAL software. Random effect model is normally run with ANALYZE HETEROGENEITY. There may be a confusion with this modified version of METAL from GitHub : https://github.com/explodecomputer/random-metal
Pay attention that you installed/used the version you needed
Hi, actually that is the one I used, but no changes..
I think I would just go with ANALYZE HETEROGENEITY because it is the official version and maybe there are issues with the custom version found on GitHub, and I currently don't see the added value for random meta-analysis because it is already implemented in the official version
Hi, I thought METAL performs fixed-effect model by default. Are you saying that by including ANALYZE HETEROGENEITY it would perform random effect model? Thank you