How to convert strand specific RNASEQ bam to bigwig
1
0
Entering edit mode
2.5 years ago
a.bafna • 0

Hi, I am working with dUTP bases stranded RNA-Seq paired end data. After aligning with STAR , I would like to convert my bam files to bigwig. I am trying to use bamCoverage but cannot use the --filterRNAstrand in Galaxy. Please can anyone help . Thanks

bamcoverage RNASEQ STrand specific • 2.3k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode

why are you unable to use --filterRNAstrand? Do you get an error when trying to use this parameter? If so, what is the error?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Hi , In usegalaxy.eu instance there is no option for --filterRNAstrand. Hence I cannot filter them.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Sounds like deeptools on that galaxy instance is out of date.

All --filterRNAStrand really does is selects reads that have mapped to one strand and returns a bigwig file with coverage of those reads. (–filterRNAstrand=forward keeps minus-strand reads, which originally came from genes on the forward strand using a dUTP-based method)

You can do this yourself using samtools view to select the minus-strand reads from your BAM file and use that as input to bamCoverage to generate your plus-strand coverage bigwig file, then repeat with plus-strand reads.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

You can do this yourself using samtools view to select the minus-strand reads from your BAM file and use that as input to bamCoverage to generate your plus-strand coverage bigwig file, then repeat with plus-strand reads.

Its not that simple with paired-end reads (because usually, the mates are on different strands), see How To Separate Illumina Based Strand Specific Rna-Seq Alignments By Strand

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
2.5 years ago
a.bafna • 0

Hi, thanks for reply. I indeed used "Only include reads originating from fragments from the forward or reverse strand" option and selected reverse . Now I assumed it will only count the plus-strand reads, which originally came from genes on the reverse strand using a dUTP-based method) On viewing the result in UCSC Browser I get the coverage as http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgTracks?db=mm10&lastVirtModeType=default&lastVirtModeExtraState=&virtModeType=default&virtMode=0&nonVirtPosition=&position=chr1%3A91405146%2D91470160&hgsid=1355475517_CvVtrd8za2fLHooDlDFACr2ZAp72. Is that what I should select and expect. I was expecting the reads to be in downward direction as given after wigtobigwig conversion for reverse reads.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1627 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6