How robust is rMATS when swapping samples?
0
0
Entering edit mode
2.5 years ago
Apex92 ▴ 320

Dear all,

I have RNA-seq data (3 control vs 3 KD replicates) where I used STAR for mapping. After merging the bam files of control and KD samples separately (using samtools) I ran rMATS to detect differential alternative splicing events. I focused on the [AS_Event].MATS.JCEC.txt files and using a custom pipeline I only selected the significant genes based on FDR < 0.05.

To see how robust is rMATS I tried to swap control and KD samples (e,g, ctrl1,kd2,kd3 vs. kd1,ctrl2,ctrl3) and ran rMATS again. I again focused on the [AS_Event].MATS.JCEC.txt files and selected the significant genes based on FDR < 0.05.

The thing that I faced and do not understand is that I do get significant alternative splicing events even after swapping samples and the overlap with the approach where I did not swap the samples is a lot. For example, in the original approach, I got 266 significant SE events and after swapping I got 310 SE events and the overlap between these two is 120 which is a lot.

Could someone please help me to understand this? Thanks.

The rMATS code that I use:

rmats.py --b1 group1_merged_bam.txt --b2 group2_merged_bam.txt --gtf /gencode.vM25.annotation.gtf -t single --readLength 80 --nthread 4 --od /output --tmp /directory1
splicing rmats RNA-seq STAR alternative • 438 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1570 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6