How can I biuld to pipeline in nextflow to download SRA files?
1
0
Entering edit mode
2.4 years ago
pavelasquezv ▴ 50

I am trying to build a pipeline for RNAseq data analysis in nextflow. Please, I have not been able to get the first step which is to download the SRA files. Please do you have any suggestions for the following error?

This is the code:

#!/usr/bin/env nextflow

srr_ch = Channel.from( lista.txt)
srr_ch.println()


 process fastqdump {
   container 'quay.io/biocontainers/parallel-fastq-dump:0.6.5--py_0'

   input:
   each srr from srr_ch

   output:
   file("*.fastq") into fastq_ch

   """
   prefetch ${srr} && parallel-fastq-dump -t 8 -s ${srr}
   """
   }

This is the error:

N E X T F L O W  ~  version 22.06.1-edge
Launching `null` [elated_hodgkin] DSL1 - revision: c897000175
No such variable: lista

 -- Check script 'script1.nf' at line: 3 or see '.nextflow.log' file for more details
nextflow • 2.0k views
ADD COMMENT
2
Entering edit mode

NextFlow people have already done this for you: https://nf-co.re/fetchngs

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks a lot GenoMax!

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode
2.4 years ago

Granted I know nothing about nextflow (snakemake guy here!)... The error says:

No such variable: lista

Perhaps srr_ch = Channel.from( lista.txt) should have quotes like srr_ch = Channel.from('lista.txt')?

Also, is prefetch ${srr} actually needed? I think parallel-fastq-dump -t 8 -s ${srr} should suffice to download fastq files.


A comment to GenoMax's answer: I have a mixed feeling about using wrappers just to execute a single command like parallel-fastq-dump - I think it makes things more complex for little merit...?

ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode

Reference where NF was recommended to OP: How to perform quality control on multiple folders using trimmomatic? thousands of SRA samples involved according to that post. So this download would become part of a larger pipeline was the logic I think.

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

GenoMax - thanks for replying. To clarify my comment, I fully support the idea of using nextflow/snakemake even for simple pipelines. My doubt is whether the pipeline should execute "parallel-fastq-dump", as in the OP's question, or a more sophisticated wrapper. In general, I'm leaning in favour of a straightforward call but I don't know the specific of the OP work.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks a lot GenoMax and Dariober. You guys are my inspiration! I will try this code. Thanks again! All the best!

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1649 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6