Deseq2 using 2x2 design
0
0
Entering edit mode
2.1 years ago

Hello,

I'm trying to use Deseq2 to find differences in microbiota composition in a 2x2 crossover study. I am not sure what model to use to detect differences between P (which is a placebo) and T (treatment). Each subject only has the two time-points (one with P and one with T). Below is my colData.

 Subject   Treatment    Phase   Sequence    Combined1   Combined2
  S1           T     One       BA         T_One   T_BA
  S1           P     Two       BA         P_Two   P_BA
  S2           P     One       AB         P_One   P_AB
  S2           T     Two       AB         T_Two   T_AB
  S3           T     One       BA         T_One   T_BA
  S3           P     Two       BA         P_Two   P_BA
  S4           T     One       BA         T_One   T_BA
  S4           P     Two       BA         P_Two   P_BA
  S5           P     One       AB         P_One   P_AB
  S5           T     Two       AB         T_Two   T_AB
  S6           P     One       AB         P_One   P_AB
  S6           T     Two       AB         T_Two   T_AB
  S7           T     One       BA         T_One   T_BA
  S7           P     Two       BA         P_Two   P_BA
  S8           P     One       AB         P_One   P_AB
  S8           T     Two       AB         T_Two   T_AB

I tried combining Treatment with Phase and Treatment with Sequence and then using the below regressions (switching out Combined1 and Combined2 leads to the same error message).

dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData = data,
                          colData = colData,
                          design=  ~ Subject + Combined1)

Whenever I do this, I just end up getting an error message of-

Please read the vignette section 'Model matrix not full rank':

I would like to test for the bacteria that are significantly different between the two treatments (P vs T), but I also want to control for sequence due to the crossover design.

What design seems appropriate?

Thank you.

Deseq2 • 912 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

is subject S2 the only subject the received sequence AB? If so, I think that might be the issue since sequence AB is confounded with subject S2.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

They are not! I updated the table. I originally only included half. Thanks.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

That helps. I'm not a statistician, but the current design of ~Subject + Combined1 doesn't seem to me like a suitable way to test for treatment effect.

I googled "DESeq2 2x2 cross over design", there are some discussions on Bioconductor support and on Biostars, for example https://support.bioconductor.org/p/p132767/ and https://www.biostars.org/p/482861/ but I think your study design or question differs a bit these other discussions.

It seems to me that testing for T versus P while controlling for subject and sequence variation would use ~ Treatment + Subject + Sequence as an initial design.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Each subject was only done with only two conditions. I don't think you can include subject in the design

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2349 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6