What's best practice when determining a degenerate base when creating a primer?
0
0
Entering edit mode
23 months ago
O.rka ▴ 740

I'm trying to design some primers myself because all of the primer packages I've found are either web-based, are not very user friendly, cannot handle large numbers of sequence targets, can't take in multiple sequence alignments, cannot create just a forward primer, and/or are not easy to install.

I'm at the last stage but now I need to decide a threshold for when to use IUPAC degenerate bases. Here is an example of a few positions that are not definitely A, C, G, or T.

For position 2697 I'll keep T but maybe for 2689 it should be C or T.

What is best practice when using a degenerate base? Should it be like setting a threshold (e.g., 70%) and if a base isn't present in at least 70% then see if the cumulative frequency for one of the degenerates is higher then choose the degenerate?

enter image description here

Degenerate bases: https://www.bioinformatics.org/sms/iupac.html

primer-design alignment genomics • 757 views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode

Your primers should have 100% homology to their target sequence. You should either order multiple primers with each alternative base or target a region that shows 100% homology between your samples.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Ok that’s good to know. I’m trying to design a primer set that can amplify fungal rRNA from 18S to 28S. Main use will be in silico

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2331 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6