Is there a way to test or say if one gene signature is better than another for predicting a phenotype?
1
0
Entering edit mode
23 months ago
msn ▴ 130

Sorry if this sounds n00b-ish. But lets say you have a drug and treat cells with one and dont treat the other. you do RNAseq and you find some DEG's that change with drug added. is there a way to score how good that signature is?

I assume something related to how many samples you have. if you have 6 cell lines in the drug treated group and 8 in the non-treated group that n would impact it, you could create come sort of z score for the gene set , then score each sample, and then see what percent is statistically higher than the mean of the non-treated group? although the n is already taken into consideration with DGE analysis a little.

what would be the best way to try and say that signature A was more informative of an outcome (or predictive) than say signature B? if you had two signatures

apologies again for n00b question and I have a feeling I am thinking about this in the wrong way but it was a late night discussion and I haven't got a good solid answer in my mind. if this was a continuous variable I think I would have some more ideas, but its binary situation... drug or no drug, disease or no disease, survivor or non-survivor type thing...

thanks in advance!

stats RNA-seq gene-signature • 966 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
23 months ago
liorglic ★ 1.5k

I think what you are looking for is the log2 fold change (L2FC) and adjusted p-value. Together these measures tell you the "effect size" and statistical significance of a DEG. These are often plotted together as what's called a volcano plot.
If you are looking for a summary statistic across all genes, then I don't know if a standard one exists, but you may simply compare the distributions of L2FC or -log P.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

yeah was more talking about a collection of DE genes ( a gene set if you will ) and how likely that gene set is associated with an outcome. if i have two gene sets for two different outcomes and I want to test for which gene set is better at predicting or even associated with a specific outcome. where ever gene in the gene set is already DE. but obviously some genes are more driven by specific sample or patients etc , and some phenotypes have more power and more samples, surely that will impact how informative a gene signature is and I just need a way to sorta weigh two or more signatures statistically in this thought experiment.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1609 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6