Hi!
I made a minimap2 index for a custom genome. I was planning on using it for pacbio and nanopore data.
I created the index using minimap2 -x map-pb -d genome.mmi genome.fa
. Unfortunately, I forgot to make one specifically for the nanopore data using map-ont
... Instead, I mapped both data sets to the same index using
For the nanopore: minimap2 -a -x map-ont genome.mmi sample.fastq.gz
For the pacbio: minimap2 -a -x map-pb genome.mmi sample.fastq.gz
I have limited experience with minimap2 and I am wondering if this is a big deal, since the mapping was using the correct parameters - it's just the index that might not be perfect for the data...
Can someone explain to me how this could affect the performance? If it would? I can't seem to find a thorough explanation about this.
Thanks,
compuTE : If you can provide an update in this thread with some stats (
samtools idxstats
may be good enough) as to how the numbers change with a common index used for ONT and PacBio VS specific indexes made for the two datasets.minimap2
is such an excellent aligner that the gross stats may remain very similar (specifics may change some).Rarely do people have both types of data and this insight would provide a very useful datapoint.