Pisces doesn't like high-quality reads when there is a soft-clip affecting the full read.
0
0
Entering edit mode
15 months ago
ManuelDB ▴ 110

When using Pisces, I get the following error.

 System.Exception: RACP2-6poolv4_P5-A_FINAL_SORTED.bam: Error processing chr 'chr7': Failed to process variants for MN01972:49:000H5KYMY:1:11102:26356:2968 ... 150S ---> System.Exception: Failed to process variants for MN01972:49:000H5KYMY:1:11102:26356:2968 ... 150S
   at Pisces.Domain.Logic.CandidateVariantFinder.ProcessCigarOps(Read alignment, String refChromosome, Int32 readStartPosition, String chromosomeName)
   at Pisces.Logic.SomaticVariantCaller.Execute()
   at Pisces.Processing.Logic.BaseGenomeProcessor.ProcessByBam(BamWorkRequest workRequest, String chrName)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---.
8/19/23 7:21 PM 1  Exception reported:
System.Exception: RACP2-6poolv4_P5-A_FINAL_SORTED.bam: Error processing chr 'chrX': Failed to process variants for MN01972:49:000H5KYMY:1:22101:7666:3361 ... 151S ---> System.Exception: Failed to process variants for MN01972:49:000H5KYMY:1:22101:7666:3361 ... 151S
   at Pisces.Domain.Logic.CandidateVariantFinder.ProcessCigarOps(Read alignment, String refChromosome, Int32 readStartPosition, String chromosomeName)
   at Pisces.Logic.SomaticVariantCaller.Execute()
   at Pisces.Processing.Logic.BaseGenomeProcessor.ProcessByBam(BamWorkRequest workRequest, String chrName)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---.
8/19/23 7:21 PM 1  Exception reported:
System.Exception: Failed to process variants for MN01972:49:000H5KYMY:1:11102:26356:2968 ... 150S
   at Pisces.Processing.Logic.BaseProcessor.Execute(Int32 maxThreads)
   at Pisces.Program.ProgramExecution()
   at CommandLine.Application.BaseApplication`1.Execute().

I have investigated this with this

 samtools view your_file.bam | grep "MN01972:49:000H5KYMY:1:11102:26356:2968"

and I got this

 MN01972:49:000H5KYMY:1:22104:2296:19556 16      chr7    148817421       60      151S    *     00       TTCAAATTTACTGCCAATGAAGAACCAAAAACATGTCGGCTCATCACCACTTCACAACACAATCCCAAGCCGTTGAAAAATTGGCCTCAACATTTATTGTGTTTGACAACGTTTAATTGGATCTACAAAACCAAATGTAAGCACTGGTCAA        A//6///A/F///=FF/////F//////FF///F///F//F////F/F=////////FF///A///F6F//F/F/FF///FF/F//F/////FA//F/F///FF///A/F////F/F////F///FFFFFFFFFFF6FFF/FFFF/AAFFF       RG:Z:230817_MN01972_0049_A000H5KYMY_RACP2-6poolv4_P5-BAS:i:30  XS:i:19

Here is the explanation:

 MN01972:49:000H5KYMY:1:22104:2296:19556: read name
16: bitwise FLAG
chr7: reference chromosome
148817421: start position of the read on the reference chromosome
60: mapping quality
151S: CIGAR string
*: reference name of the mate/next read
0: position of the mate/next read
0: observed template length
TTCAAATTT...GTCAA: sequence
A//6///A.../AAFFF: quality

The issue might be with the CIGAR string, which is 151S. The CIGAR string is used to represent alignment characteristics. The S in the CIGAR string represents a soft-clipped alignment, where the bases are present in the read but not used in the alignment. Here, it is saying that all 151 bases of the read are soft-clipped, meaning none of the bases are actually aligned to the reference genome.

This happens because I use the primers to map the reads and then I use Softclipp (Samtools) to mark the primer. So, in reads with a soft-clipp in the middle plus the soft-clipp I stamp completely covers the read.

I am developing an NGS pipeline with BWA MEM, Marrk duplicates and Pisces. I am wondering (and this is the reason of this post) who could I manage these reads in a secure way?? The code I am using for Pisces so far is the basic

 apptainer exec --bind "$ref_folder":"$ref_folder" \
               "$pisces"  dotnet /app/Pisces_5.2.9.122/Pisces.dll \
               -bam  "${Sample_ID}"_FINAL_SORTED.bam \
               -g  "$piscesrefgenomefolder" \
               -o ./ \
               -i ../amplicons_coo_v1.0.bed  \
               --gvcf false

The quality of this reads (at least in this example) is very high so excluding these reads by quality is not going to work. I need some advice. I think, the best way of doing this is to deleting reads in advance in which the whole read is soft-clipped. Any advice??

Pisces • 487 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2781 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6